Search
Close this search box.

Enhancing the Quality of Leadership Decision-Making in a Post-COVID World

Organizations across the world are scrambling to find effective survivability and sustainability options as they strive to stay relevant in a devastated corporate landscape reeling from the profound impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Corporate leaders are increasingly burdened with stark choices that beckon tough decision-making with a strong probability of negative reverberations among the apprehensive workforces.

(An Exploratory Peak into Overcoming the Multidimensional Humanistic Challenges)

Organizations across the world are scrambling to find effective survivability and sustainability options as they strive to stay relevant in a devastated corporate landscape reeling from the profound impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Corporate leaders are increasingly burdened with stark choices that beckon tough decision-making with a strong probability of negative reverberations among the apprehensive workforces.

The key success factor in the respective context is to assure/ensure that the quality of decision-making is not egregiously compromised as the pressure increases to maintain the semblance of a ‘going concern’ for nervous stakeholders.  Consequently, it is incumbent upon corporate leaders to astutely realize the existing and emergent challenges that are liable to impact all the crucial aspects of organizational functionality and chart a principled approach to decision-making that increases the probability of yielding desired outcomes in a post-COVID world.  Some of the multidimensional humanistic challenges are as follows:

  1. Retaining and maintaining a motivated workforce to facilitate the fulfillment of the strategic and operational goals of the organization
  2. Upskilling/reskilling the workforce for the evolving nature of work
  3. Conducting effective and meaningful orientations for the new employees
  4. Stimulating relationship building/sustainability initiatives with the workforce, especially, those with open/hidden ‘grievances’ and ‘trust’ issues
  5. Reinforcing/revitalizing succession management strategies/plans, talent pipelines, and prudent management practices
  6. Invigorating high engagement levels within a multigenerational workforce
  7. Managing health and wellbeing aspects with increased priority, e.g., fatigue resulting from excessive screen time, fear of losing the job compounded by feelings of inadequacy, career derailment, suppressing the rumor mill, disciplinary issues, organizational politics, family pressures, separation anxiety for expats from their loved ones, too much time to oneself, etc.
  8. Maintaining/sharpening focus on Diversity, Inclusion, Belonging, and Equity (DIBE) initiatives
  9. Assuring/ensuring seamless mobility of expatriates and inpatriates
  10. Maintaining/uplifting a value-driven corporate culture
  11. Strengthening organizational cohesion through a ‘unifying’ corporate culture
  12. Monitoring and rectifying fractures in employment relationships, especially, between supervisors and their team members
  13. Providing effective online and offline support to an international multigenerational workforce
  14. Strategizing bonding/re-bonding activities between the workforce and leadership, especially, with respect to strengthening psychological contracts
  15. Realizing workforce deployment and optimization with respect to the lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic, e.g., better utilization of office spaces, effective utilization of available resources, increasing efficiency through synergistic partnerships between the human workforce and the AI-driven entities, raising the standards of employment, etc.
  16. Making prudent choices in the acquisition of relevant/new technologies while phasing out the insufficient/obsolete ones
  17. Revising and updating policies/procedures/processes with respect to various HR services, e.g., revamping the structure of Total Rewards according to the ‘new’ normal, increasing the percentage of online training for a hybrid workforce, etc.
  18. Designing/defining/enhancing ‘employee experience’, especially, for those working from home and supporting/facilitating/enabling it with suitable policies/processes/procedures
  19. Devising transparent and judicious accountability and performance standards in a hybrid work environment that are imbued with the ‘felt-fairness’ element
  20. Developing and strengthening risk management plans in coordination with relevant functions to be proactively prepared for future challenges, e.g., effective deployment/replacement of the local/regional/global workforces during the next pandemic
  21. Managing interactive online HR services efficiently and effectively while assuring/ensuring suitable and robust backup measures in case of linkage/connectivity issues
  22. Enhancing HR agility that is congruent with organizational imperatives to timely overcome anticipated/unanticipated challenges
  23. Assuring/ensuring efficacious communication/coordination/cooperation with the international workforce, especially, those deployed in remote locations, for catering to relevant needs/expectations
  24. Sustaining an attractive employer brand for future talent acquisition, cherished corporate standing, and meaningful CSR initiatives
  25. Dealing with apprehensive unions wary of furloughs, layoffs and reduced compensation/benefits
  26. Walking the fine line between the applicable labor laws and corporate imperatives for survivability and sustainability
  27. Assuring/ensuring the consistent infusion of new talent by leveraging suitable technology in coordination with the functional heads
  28. Providing a seamless exit experience for employees leaving the organization with minimal damage to the employer brand
  29. Getting employees comfortable with the ‘new’ normal
  30. Finding/allocating enough time and space for self-reflection and self-calibration to stay motivated and committed while resisting the apprehensions/pressures related to personal job insecurity

The aforementioned challenges require leaders that are suitably prepped for the Digital Age (see: https://lnkd.in/dpf2JZb) in terms of taking quality decisions.  Let’s review the 3 main types of decisions that are generally taken by corporate leaders, i.e.:

Wrong decisions
These are the erroneous decisions that are driven by bias, malevolence, sabotage, incompetence, risk-averseness, and/or unavailability of crucial facts.  Such decisions are the result of compromising on foresight/objectivity by succumbing to the perils of uncertainty.  Their impact/ramification frequently requires salvation through the benefit of hindsight by engaging in an honest reflection and calibration on a personal and professional level for enhancing the quality of decision-making in the future.

Right decisions
These are the correct decisions that are based upon impartial and competent weighing of available facts, studious consultation and judgmental prowess by employing suitable risk assessment methodologies/approaches. Such decisions are the result of harnessing foresight/objectivity by deploying ‘thriving in chaos’ principles for optimizing outcomes in uncertainty.  Their impact/ramification provides a fertile ground for reinforcement of good practices and is a valuable addition to the ‘knowledge bank’ for grooming the next generation of leaders.

Sound decisions
These are the astute decisions that are rooted in ground-based reality with a profound understanding of inherent risk management capability and make sense in the prevailing circumstances by extracting/filtering the best option from a range of available options that can be materialized within available resources.  Such decisions embrace foresight/objectivity by realizing the ‘uncertainty’ of uncertainty and favor rationality in justifying a chosen course of action that is rich in practicality.  Their impact/ramification may eventually be deemed right or wrong based upon evolving circumstances with the benefit of hindsight.

The following ‘DISH’ framework can be used by the corporate leaders to enhance the quality of decision-making in a post-COVID world:

Direct
This refers to having an unclouded/unrestricted/unbiased embrace of the available data and information from reliable/curated sources that can lead to enhancing the quality of decision-making.

Informed
This refers to increasing the level of cognizance in terms of associated risks with the available options before arriving at a ‘sound’ decision for overcoming an existing or emerging challenge.

Simple
This refers to prioritizing the ease of steps involved in the materialization of the ‘selected’ option for charting a course of action with clear accountabilities and realizable timelines.

Honest
This refers to modeling the personality traits that will create a strong ‘buy-in’ from the stakeholders who have to act upon and/or are impacted by the decision that has been taken.

The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially amplified the demand on corporate leaders in terms of increasing the quality of their decision-making due to the rapid evaporation of any buffers/cushions to safeguard against any lapses in judgment.  Resilience is now directly proportional to survival in terms of personal and organizational futures.  Are you the ‘right’ leader for the times?

Read more

Latest News

Read More

The 3 challenges leaders face when seeking outcomes at pace

28 March 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE