Search
Close this search box.

GB’s Olympics, fewer medals but a better story

The successful coach stresses that their methods, however brutal they seem to the outsider, deliver Olympic medals. A good coach has fewer medals but doesn’t rely on bullying, intimidation, physical and emotional abuse to get results. As in sport so in business.

I read that a British Olympic gold medallist summed up Team GB’s  performance is his sport at the Tokyo Olympics  as , “ Fewer medals but a better story”. I am guessing he was referring to the revelations of bullying and ill treatment of athletes that emerged following the previous Olympics in which a record number of medals were won.

We now know that physical and emotional abuse has been a part  of the training methods of some of the most successful coaches. Athletes suffered unnecessary pain forced to train whilst carrying injuries , were routinely  verbally abused, threaten and humiliated in front of other team members. And if they complained their dedication and commitment was questioned. Whilst the coaches justified their methods by the improved performance the sporting body turned a blind eye due to the prospect of increased medals.

There are parallels here with the actions of senior managers prior to the pandemic and the shift in some quarters since. The chief executive as a bully,  who intimidates, threatens and abuses, who insists in total commitment, who does not tolerate questioning of their methods or decisions,  who constantly demands more of individuals often at the expense of family and any life outside of work. Justified in their minds by the improved performance whilst the board turns a blind eye seduced by increased profits, or a dramatic move up the league table.

Just as some within sports governing bodies are acknowledging that the end does not justify the means and that they have a responsibility for the health and mental well-being of athletes some organisations /businesses are deciding that success should not be at the expense of the individuals wellbeing.

The pandemic and being furloughed  or required to  work from home has led many within organisations to question their relationship with work, do they want to go back to how it was before ? Whilst at the same time there has been a significant raising of awareness around mental well-being leading apparently successful people to question whether the way their organisation expects them to work is doing them harm?

For the individual this may be trading status and financial reward for a better quality of family life. For an organisation it may be fewer medals but a better story.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    AI’s Impact on the Workplace: A Survey of American Managers

    27 March 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £32,332 to £38,205 pa, pro rata

    University of Cambridge – Judge Business SchoolSalary: £29,605 to £33,966 pa, pro rata

    University of Oxford – Blavatnik School of GovernmentSalary: Grade 5: £28,759 – £33,966 per annum (with a discretionary range to £37,099)

    Software Development Director (Exec Team Seat). Remote Working with Ellesmere Port Office-Based Minimum 1 Day Per Week. + Contribution towards membership fees. £120,000 – £140,000

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE