Who has the burden of proof where dismissal reason is disputed?

Reading time: 3 minutes

Who has the burden of proof where dismissal reason is disputed?

S 98 (1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 states that it is for the employer to show the reason for dismissal. But what’s the position where the claimant argues that the real reason is not that put forward by the employer, but an entirely different reason, for example, making a protected disclosure? Where does the burden of proof lie?

Roche claimed that Dr Kuzel was dismissed for misconduct, or alternatively, some other substantial reason – there had been a complete breakdown in the working relationship with one of her colleagues and she had broken an agreement reached with her manager, who was the Global Head of Regional Affairs, meaning that he had lost all trust in her. Dr Kuzel argued the dismissal was because she had made three protected disclosures.

The tribunal held that Dr Kuzel’s dismissal was unfair as Roche had failed to make out a potentially fair reason for the dismissal. However, the dismissal was not automatically unfair, and therefore the compensation ‘cap’ applied, as Dr Kuzel had not established that the reason for her dismissal was the fact that she had made protected disclosures. The EAT upheld Dr Zuzel’s appeal holding that the tribunal had not correctly approached the burden of proof.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the tribunal got it ‘right first time’. According to Mummery LJ, the meaning of S.98(1) is “blindingly obvious”. It is for the employer to show that it had a potentially fair reason for dismissing the employee. If the employee claims there is a different reason, the burden of proof does not pass to the him or her. All the employee needs to do is challenge the evidence put forward by the employer and produce some evidence to support his or her assertion that the dismissal was for an entirely different reason.

 

Kuzel v Roche Products Limited

[2008] EWCA Civ 380 Case No: A2/2007/0630

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Staff augmentation – the answer to the IT talent shortage

10 January 2025

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

You’ll need to be someone who is commercially minded and can enable business growth and profitability through people plans, with the ability to persuade and

The HR Dept offers a fantastic opportunity for HR professionals looking to start their own HR business in their local area. When you join The

DOE :Hays:Group HR Director / Head of HR – InsuranceCity of London, England. This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

DOE :Hays:Group HR Director / Head of HR – InsuranceCity of London, England. This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where