Acas publish guide to job evaluation systems
Acas, the employment relations service, has launched a new guide to help make businesses less vulnerable to equal pay claims through the use of job evaluation. The guide, which considers the benefits and risks of undertaking job evaluation, explains how a job evaluation risk analysis should be established and implemented.
The new Job Evaluation advice booklet is launched as the 2008 Acas’ annual report shows a 25 per cent rise in employment tribunals and potential employment tribunal claims. This rise was partly attributed to equal pay claims.
Job evaluation – which determines the relative importance of a number of different jobs whilst avoiding prejudice or discrimination – can be a complex process. This guide has been designed to help managers and employee representatives decide whether introducing a job evaluation structure is feasible and appropriate for their business.
Acas is urging businesses to be fully prepared before embarking on introducing job evaluation. A good number of the difficulties encountered by organisations will be avoided by adequate preparation. The booklet gives advice on the level of preparation required, which if undertaken properly, will create defensible pay structures and strong business benefits.
The booklet also explains how analytical job evaluation works in practice and discusses in more detail the use of factor plans. Non-analytical job evaluation schemes such as ‘paired comparisons’ or ‘job ranking’ do not provide a defence against equal value claims and are not included in this guide.
The guide can be downloaded for free at http://www.acas.org.uk./
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.