100% productivity is a myth that risks hindering instead of helping wellbeing

“It would be impossible to get productivity loss to zero. Thinking you can, might only lead to work-related stress and burnout. The important point is, the most satisfied employees have a much lower level of productivity loss than the very dissatisfied employees. So, our focus should be on bringing the tail up”

Productivity losses for employees with low individual wellbeing and commitment are as much as 2.5 times more than those with high individual wellbeing and commitment, finds new research from Fruitful Insights, in partnership with Legal & General Group Protection. To put that another way, where low individual wellbeing and commitment are factors, productivity loss per employee is calculated at £10,500 per year, in comparison to a productivity loss of £4,200 per employee, per year where individual wellbeing and commitment are high.1

This suggests that helping the UK working population reach both a level of high individual wellbeing and commitment could generate as much as £34 billion in improved productivity per year.1

Subjective wellbeing measures only tell half a story; the what, but not the why

Data* confirms a widely held understanding that subjective wellbeing measures – such as job satisfaction – correlate directly to the impact of wellbeing on the productivity of a business; the lower the overall satisfaction level of employees, the less productive the business is.

This can help to show whether a company has a positive or negative overall employee wellbeing status, says Fruitful Insights, but it doesn’t tell us why this is the case.

Analysis* found that cultural factors – such as work control, competence and relatedness (good relationships with managers and colleagues) – represented the key drivers that lead to positively or negatively impacting wellbeing. For example, comparing responses from employees who ‘definitely agree’ or ‘definitely disagree’ with various key cultural factors that impact wellbeing:

  • Productivity loss for an employee without supportive colleagues is calculated at £10,000; more than double the productivity loss for an employee with supportive colleagues (£4,700)
  • For an employee who feels valued versus an employee who doesn’t, the productivity loss is £3,700 vs £10,400 respectively.
  • And where an employee feels their skills are being used appropriately versus an employee who doesn’t, the loss is £3,600 vs £9,800 respectively.

100% productivity is a myth; it risks hindering, instead of helping, wellbeing

These findings also reveal that 100% productivity is a myth, say Fruitful Insights and Legal & General Group Protection. As shown in the data above, even where employees are on their best form, there is some productivity loss; likely due to an element of absence or dissatisfaction, says Fruitful.

Mike Tyler, Chairman and Co-Founder of Fruitful Insights: “It would be impossible to get productivity loss to zero. Thinking you can, might only lead to issues such as work-related stress and burnout. The important point is that the most satisfied employees have a much lower level of productivity loss than the very dissatisfied employees. So, our focus should be on bringing the tail up; focusing on where people are dissatisfied, as opposed to expecting 100%.

“There’s clearly a big prize to be had, in terms of improving wellbeing and commitment, and hence productivity of the UK working population. But that won’t be achieved through subjective wellbeing measures alone. These are important, but it’s time to evolve. To really get to the core of the matter, employers need to be encouraged to focus on the cultural drivers of wellbeing. It’s for all these reasons that we designed Fruitful Insights; provided at no extra cost to the majority of Legal & General Group Protection’s clients covering 100+ employees.” 2

Colin Fitzgerald, Distribution Director – Group Protection, Legal & General Retail: “The Fruitful Insights platform not only helps the intermediaries that work with us – and their clients – to quantify the impact of wellbeing on productivity, it also helps them gain subjective insights from employees. And, crucially, it also helps them identify the cultural drivers. This allows them to identify priorities, action plans and follow-up assessments to help improve wellbeing and performance within a client’s business.

“Our group protection products are as much about wellbeing – helping employees be well, get better and be supported – as they are about insurance. And we want our employer clients and their employees to make full use of the valuable services provided alongside the insurance product. At the same time though, we’re fully aware that value of investment into benefits, services and interventions, will only be fully realised by organisations when the environment in which they sit – the culture – is also conducive to good wellbeing.”

1 Calculation is representative of the UK working population; based on an average salary of £36,000pa (ONS, 2023) estimated UK population of 30 million (Sept 2024 estimate, ONS Census) and using Fruitful Insights’ 2024 client data (difference in productivity costs of best performing group and worst), against growth in UK GDP – forecast by OECD to be 1.1% in 2024 (£34B would therefore be ~1.5%).
2 Access to Fruitful Insights’ expertise is provided at no extra cost to Legal & General Group Protection clients where their group income protection or group life assurance policy covers 100 employees or more.

*Data from Fruitful

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Untapping the potential of diversity

    26 November 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    University of Greenwich – HRSalary: £45,163 to £55,295 per annum, plus £5400 London weighting pro rata per annum

    Universities UK – Human ResourcesSalary: £21,441 to £24,474 per annum pro rata, dependant on experience

    Derby College GroupSalary: £39,748 per annum, pro rata (actual salary £32,229)

    University of Oxford – NDM HR Centres of ExcellenceSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata) – Grade 6

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE