How to re-imagine benefits for a post-Covid business

A survey from Group Risk Development (GRiD) [i] which found that 73% of employers think the pandemic will result in long term changes to how they support the health and wellbeing of their staff.  Employers expect to increase support for physical wellbeing (57%), social wellbeing (54%), financial wellbeing (52%), improve the choice of benefits (49%) and provide support for dependants (48%). Gregson says, “For many businesses, changing their employee benefits can be problematic, and, as such, many benefits offerings continue to look the way they have always looked. The big question for HR is why and how the business should do a review, even if not compelled to do so?”

Many businesses will need to review and re-imagine their benefits and wellbeing strategy, in light of the impact and changing work environment created by the pandemic.

At Howden’s latest webinar, ‘Our Ultimate Guide to Re-imagining your Benefits Strategy’  host Matthew Gregson said companies often leave it too long to do a review so challenges arise.

He pointed to a recent study from Group Risk Development (GRiD)[i] which found that 73% of employers think the pandemic will result in long term changes to how they support the health and wellbeing of their staff.  Employers expect to increase support for physical wellbeing (57%), social wellbeing (54%), financial wellbeing (52%), improve the choice of benefits (49%) and provide support for dependants (48%).

Gregson says, “For many businesses, changing their employee benefits can be problematic, and, as such, many benefits offerings continue to look the way they have always looked. The big question for HR is why and how the business should do a review, even if not compelled to do so?

Matthew highlights four common challenges for companies when evaluating their benefits strategy and how to address them.

The first is engagement – this is perhaps the main return on investment from an effective benefits programme and organisations should have a measure of the level of engagement with their offer.

The second is cost – the investment in benefits and wellbeing can be too high, too low or directed to the wrong people or the wrong products and services. Having all costs to hand is the first step.

Thirdly, there are risks – financial, operational, and reputational risk to the business. Companies need to take a more systematic approach to understanding where their exposures lie.

And lastly, administrative challenges – the burden could be too high, with too much manual intervention and not provide a good employee experience.

He said, “Companies need to check if they are wasting effort within the HR team and where processes and experience breakdown for employees. Overcoming these challenges is essential for the benefits strategy to meet the needs of the business and people – but this can only be done by understanding the problems it is trying to solve. That requires data, analysis and understanding at a level many HR teams don’t get to.

“Companies should review their benefits every three to five years. Most challenges are likely to sit within one of these four areas, with engagement being the most fundamental to a successful programme.  A review could begin with an employee survey to understand what employees like, do not like about the current benefits and what they would value going forward.

“Evaluating cost, risk and admin are necessary too. Once they have a clear idea of where they are at, organisations can look forward and align benefits to the business and the people agenda over the next five years. They will understand where changes are needed, so they can develop the business case to secure funding or the commitment to undertake a significant review.

“As businesses emerge from the pandemic and perhaps are looking at new markets or changes in operations, it’s an opportune time to conduct a review to ensure benefits match where the business is heading. Only by evaluating existing benefits, can companies make informed decisions to build a great benefits programme that offers value to both employer and employees.”

[i] https://healthcareandprotection.com/grid-employers-expect-to-increase-health-and-wellbeing-support-for-staff/

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Business ethics v the bottom line

    22 December 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    Location : Malvern Contractual hours : 35 hours per week Basis : Full Time, Permanent The job requirements are detailed below. Where applicable the skills,

    University of Nottingham – HR Business Partnering & Emp Relations Salary: £34,866 to £46,485

    HRUCSalary: £36,964 to £39,023 per annum including London Weighting

    Swansea University – Human ResourcesSalary: £26,038 to £28,879 per annum

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE