Female worker wins sex discrimination claim after colleague told her to ‘go back to your stripping job’ then colleague wins race discrimination claim after mishandling of complaint

In Mr W Butt and Miss A Fountain v Elevate Staffing Ltd a female worker has won almost £6,000 in a sex discrimination case after a male colleague told her to ‘go back to your stripping job’ as ‘that’s all you’re good for’ – before he then won nearly £5,000 over the way the company handled her complaint. 

In Mr W Butt and Miss A Fountain v Elevate Staffing Ltd a female worker has won almost £6,000 in a sex discrimination case after a male colleague told her to ‘go back to your stripping job’ as ‘that’s all you’re good for’ – before he then won nearly £5,000 over the way the company handled her complaint.

Ashleigh Fountain was told by Waqar Butt she was going to be sacked and as a ‘lusty woman’ she would be better suited to a career taking her clothes off for money, an employment tribunal heard.

He claimed he made the remark because Ms Fountain had ‘antagonised’ him and wasn’t being a ‘good friend’ during the project they were working on together.

But, due to his comment, she sued the recruitment company which hired her and has now won £5,960 in compensation.

In an unusual twist, Mr Butt himself won almost £5,000 after successfully claiming race discrimination over the firm’s handling of her complaint against him. He claimed a manager called him a ‘liar’ and used ‘racist language’ with phrases such as ‘I know you people’.

The tribunal in Southampton, Hants, heard that Ms Fountain and Mr Butt worked on a Brexit-related haulier project as part of their work with Elevate Staffing from 12 November 2020.

Their job was to quiz HGV and lorry drivers at motorway service stations to provide an understanding on the changes impacting them as a result of Britain leaving the EU.

The company told the tribunal Mr Butt was removed from this project in December due to behaviour issues and complaints against him due to ‘inappropriate comments towards women’.

Employment Judge Jonathan Gray said: ‘We find that the matters proven on the balance of probability to have occurred on 9 December 2020 are abusive and demeaning verbal references on the grounds of sex by [Mr Butt] towards [Ms Fountain].

‘This is less favourable treatment when compared to a hypothetical male comparator as we accept that such comments would not be made to a man.

‘In respect of the concerns over racist conduct towards [Mr Butt] him not being believed by Ms Stephens, there is sufficient [evidence] in our view [to form] the racial connection to the comments “I know you people” and “I’ve dealt with people like you.”

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Feedback can be provocative, but it’s what people want it

8 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Warwick – WMGSalary: £24,044 to £26,038 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and

This is an exciting opportunity for an experienced HR Director to join a high-profile organisation in an exciting period of change. We are currently partnering

HR Director, Cumbria, c£100,000 plus car allowance, bonus and LTIPS. Our client is like no other A pioneering business made up from some of the

Durham University – HR & ODSalary: £58,596 to £65,814. Grade 9, per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE