In the case of Ms P. Mntonintshi and Ms U. Jama v Barking Havering & Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust and Ms C. Beck Ms Jama, a biochemist of Somali origin, was subjected to numerous incidents of racial discrimination and harassment over a two-year period, the tribunal found, which included her being called “paininarse” on a public work document.
It heard how in February 2020, Ms Jama was left shaken when her colleague Tatyana Zadorozny lost her temper and threw a tube containing a patient’s sample where she and two black colleagues were sitting, causing her to make a health and safety complaint.
Judges found that she was passed over for a training course, which a white colleague was offered, and that she was instructed to work while off sick with Covid in retaliation for making race discrimination complaints.
Now the Trust has been ordered to pay at least £58,632 towards the senior scientist.
The tribunal heard how the “offensive” tag of “paininarse” showed up over Ms Jama’s name in a public spreadsheet seen across the Trust.
Although employment judges accepted this was inserted innocently by a colleague, who intended it as a nickname for the computer, her boss, Iris Valera-Larios, was found to have racially harassed her by failing to take steps to remove the “paininarse” tag.
Separately, Princess Mntonintshi, another claimant from the same department, was awarded a payout of £64,217 over race discrimination.
Employment judges were told how the scientist, of Black South African origin, was wrongly accused of fraud while on a probationary period by her manager, Ms Valera-Larios.
The tribunal heard: “This brought back the treatment she experienced during apartheid in South Africa, when black people were accused of criminal acts they had not done and monitored for the colour of their skin.”
Matthew Trainer, Trust Chief Executive, said: “I’d like to offer our sincere apologies to Princess and Ubah for their experiences at our Trust.
“The discrimination they experienced was unacceptable. We failed to act appropriately when they raised concerns, and we need to do better.”
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
