Exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts "should be banned"

Exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts "should be banned"

The CIPD is recommending the Government ban employers from using exclusivity clauses for zero hours contract workers unless they can demonstrate a compelling business reason for using them.

The recommendation is included in the CIPD's response to the Government's consultation on zero hours employment contracts. The CIPD also recommends the Government consider introducing a right for zero hours contract workers to request a minimum number of hours per week after they have been working for an organisation for at least 12 months. In addition, the CIPD is calling for an amendment to the Employment Rights Act to require that workers and not just employees have the right to receive a written copy of their terms and conditions not later than two months in employment .This would help provide greater clarity on behalf of both parties on the issue of employment status and the associated employment rights.

The CIPD's response was informed by responses from more than 170 members and its research report 'Zero hours contracts: Myth and reality' which showed that in many instances zero hours contracts provide useful flexibility for both employers and individuals engaged on these types of working arrangement. The research showed that zero hours workers are more likely to be satisfied with their work-life balance (65 percent) compared to all employees (58 percent), are less likely to feel under excessive pressure every day (8 percent) compared to all employees (13 percent) and have comparable job satisfaction (60 percent compared to 59 percent for all employees).

However it also found that a minority of zero hours workers (15 percent) say they are only sometimes allowed to work for another organisation when their primary employer has no work available and nine percent say they are never able to work for another organisation in these circumstances. Ben Willmott, Head of Public Policy at CIPD, comments: “Our research reveals that zero hours contracts can work well for both employers and individuals on these types of working arrangements, providing valuable workplace and labour market flexibility. However, our research also flagged that bad practice does exist. Our consultation response sets out what CIPD believes should be done to ensure that zero hours workers don't feel they are being exploited. 

“We are recommending that exclusivity clauses should be outlawed unless there is a justifiable and compelling business case for them to be used, for instance where an employee working for a competitor may result in the loss of commercially sensitive or valuable information. The nature of zero hours employment means that some people on these arrangements might have more than one job and so it is unfair for employers to require that zero hours staff can't work for other organisations when they cannot provide work, except in very specific circumstances. We'd also like to see workers who have been working for an employer for 12 months or more given the right to request a minimum number of working hours per week.”

The main calls are:

The use of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts preventing workers from working for another employer should be banned, with a narrow exemption for employers that can demonstrate a compelling business reason, for example, confidentiality or the protection of trade secrets. 

CIPD recommends that staff on zero hours contracts should, after a minimum period of 12 months service with an employer, have the legal right to request a minimum number of hours per week.  Employers would have to respond positively to the request unless they had a business reason for turning it down.

The CIPD believes all workers should be legally entitled to a written copy of their terms and conditions not later than two months in employment (currently under the Employment Rights Act 1996 only employees are entitled to this). This would help provide greater clarity on behalf of both parties on the issue of employment status and the associated employment rights.

The CIPD would support the creation of a code of practice setting out for employers and zero hours workers some key principles and guidance on the responsible management of these types of working arrangements.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Untapping the potential of diversity

26 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Human Resources Manager Cammell Laird This is a key HR role supporting leadership and managing day to day HR operations for our large Birkenhead based

Human Resources Manager Up to £42,000 per annum benefits (including 25 days annual leave and pension) Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 7TW. Rainbow Trust Children’s Charity is

University of Greenwich – HRSalary: £45,163 to £55,295 per annum, plus £5400 London weighting pro rata per annum

Universities UK – Human ResourcesSalary: £21,441 to £24,474 per annum pro rata, dependant on experience

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE