Tattoos give employers the needle

Tattoos give employers the needle

Commenting on employers’ reactions to tattoos, following the presentation of research to the British Sociological Association, Ann Oliver, Senior Associate at Charles Russell LLP, comments.

To a large extent, employers are free to set a dress-code that they consider appropriate for their business and for some employers this may include reference to tattoos and body art. Employers need to ensure that any such policy is enforced consistently to seek to avoid claims of discrimination. For example, an individual may claim that their tattoo/body art – including temporary work such as henna – relates to their religion or beliefs. If a clear, universally applied policy exists, such a claim is going to be difficult to succeed with. However, such complaints should always be dealt with on their facts and with sensitivity. It is also important that both male and female employees are treated in the same way, including in relation to tattoos. “It is worth mentioning that tattoos and body piercings are expressly stated not to be impairments (and cannot therefore be disabilities) for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. “Each person’s body art will be different, meaning a fixed policy is difficult. However, the company should form a view as to what it generally considers acceptable. For example, would a single tattoo on an arm be acceptable, where an entire ‘sleeve’ might not? Consideration should also be given as to how the company may wish such body art to be concealed or covered up and whether the employee’s specific role should be taken into account (for example, is the role customer-facing?). A sensible approach would be to limit the policy provisions to visible tattoos.

“It is important that all employees are made aware of the policy terms and that they are set out as clearly as possible. In addition, specific training should be given to those who will be required to enforce the policy, including how to deal sensitively with the issue. Body art is very personal and individuals may not take kindly to what they may perceive as criticism or an attempt to repress their personality.”

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Untapping the potential of diversity

26 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Greenwich – HRSalary: £45,163 to £55,295 per annum, plus £5400 London weighting pro rata per annum

Universities UK – Human ResourcesSalary: £21,441 to £24,474 per annum pro rata, dependant on experience

Derby College GroupSalary: £39,748 per annum, pro rata (actual salary £32,229)

University of Oxford – NDM HR Centres of ExcellenceSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata) – Grade 6

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE