Whose side is HR really on?

The Ministry of Peace in George Orwell’s 1984 is responsible for the War effort and the Ministry of Truth is responsible for propaganda whilst Ministry of Love is responsible for ensuring loyalty to Big Brother. So should HR be the department of Peace Love and Harmony ?
Could Peace, Love and Harmony be the motto of your average HR department after all isn’t the goal of every HR team to remove conflict and improving mutual understanding? Or is it about making sure Management’s will prevails. Is it about resolving conflicts fairly or advising managers how to win the argument?
This peace could have been titled whose side are you on? Because a middle manager accused of bullying doesn’t think HR is should be so willing to listen to a disgruntled employee. It’s something a manager may say in frustration when HR advise that they don’t have grounds for dismissing an employee despite the managers view that the individual is , “lazy and useless “. An employee might not say it but comments that it’s a wast of time using the grievance process if you feel you have been overlooked for a post or denied a training opportunity are not unusual.
Whistle blowers have been know to claim that HR and senior management are more concerned about the organisation reputation than taking claims of abuse and discrimination seriously. When it comes to allegation of racism and misogyny HR have been criticised for trying to resolve differences rather than dismissing offenders.
Senior management often act as if HR were simply there to do their bidding or at best smooth the process of changing working practices, reorganisation and any subsequent redundancies. And I know from personal experience chief executives are the worst for thinking the organisation’s policies and procedures don’t apply to them when it comes to circumnavigating the recruit process or regrading a post,”because they have promised the individual”!
It maybe hard to hold the line and resist the pressures but to my mind HR is not on anyone’s side but is trying to keep the organisation true to the values and principles incorporated in the policies and procedure endorsed by the board even when the board themselves may find it inconvenient to do so.
If this makes HR sound idealistic even pious that’s not my experience. HR professionals are very pragmatic even street wise. If you say to an HR professional can I do this they will tell you all the reasons why you can’t but if you say how can I do this?

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Top mental health priorities for HR in 2025

    19 December 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    Location : Malvern Contractual hours : 35 hours per week Basis : Full Time, Permanent The job requirements are detailed below. Where applicable the skills,

    University of Nottingham – HR Business Partnering & Emp Relations Salary: £34,866 to £46,485

    HRUCSalary: £36,964 to £39,023 per annum including London Weighting

    Swansea University – Human ResourcesSalary: £26,038 to £28,879 per annum

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE