Bank ordered to install lift for disabled customer
A judge has ordered the Royal Bank of Scotland install a lift so that a wheelchair user can have the same access as any other customer. Furthermore, in recognising the embarrassing treatment the young man experienced at the hands of the bank, he was awarded £6,500 – the highest ever compensation payout in this kind of case.
It is unlawful for businesses and public bodies to treat disabled people less favourably. But since the Disability Discrimination Act came into force in 1995, a judge has never before ordered an injunction to force an organisation to make physical changes to its property so that disabled people can gain access.
Mr. Allen’s case was taken with the support of the Equality & Human Rights Commission and representation by the Sheffield Law Centre. David Allen’s legal battle began when, contrary to signage outside his local branch of the bank and information posted on its website, he found that he could not gain access.
In a catalogue of incidents, David had to discuss his current account details in the street, breaching his right to confidentiality and causing him significant embarrassment. The bank then suggested that he should use the nearest accessible RBS branch, even though it was a 10 mile journey and amounted to a two and a half hour round trip journey by bus.
Judge Dowse, in the Sheffield County Court, ruled that the Bank discriminated against Mr Allen by not providing physical access to wheelchair users in its Sheffield city centre branch, and that the bank made no serious attempts to make the branch accessible to wheelchair users as required under the law.
In handing down his judgment, Judge Dowse described discrimination against disabled people as ‘a social evil’ and added “It is plain that David has suffered from considerable embarrassment caused by the Bank”.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.