Risk assessment is not required for every pregnancy




























Risk
assessment is not required for every pregnancy




In O’Neill v Buckinghamshire CC, the EAT held there is
no general obligation to carry out a risk assessment on pregnant employees.
In order to trigger the obligation the work must be of a kind which could
involve a risk of harm or danger to the health and safety of an expectant
mother or her baby.

When Ms O’Neill became pregnant, the Head Teacher started a risk
assessment. Because of school holidays, sick leave and maternity leave, the
risk assessment was not discussed with Ms O’Neill. She claimed this was a
failure to conduct the risk assessment fully and amounted to sex
discrimination under S.3A of the Sex Discrimination Act, which makes less
favourable treatment on the grounds of pregnancy unlawful. The tribunal
disagreed. The evidence demonstrated that Ms O’Neill’s work involved no risks
to her or her baby, so the duty to conduct a risk assessment did not apply. Ms
O’Neill appealed, arguing that there is a general obligation to carry out a
risk assessment on pregnant employees.

The EAT rejected Ms O’Neill’s

appeal. The Court of Appeal in Madarassy v Nomura
International Plc [2007] IRLR 246 made it clear that
there was no general obligation to carry out a risk assessment on pregnant
employees with the result that failure to carry out such a risk assessment
would be automatic sex discrimination. The duty only arises where risks to the
health and safety of any new or expectant mother, or to that of their babies
could arise from work processes or conditions. In this case Ms O’Neill was
simply not

exposed to any such risks.

 

 

 

 

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How to effectively manage multigenerational workforces

11 July 2025

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Cambridge – Human Resources DivisionSalary: £41,671 to £55,755 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment

University of Oxford – Harris Manchester CollegeSalary: £28,889 to £33,453 (FTE equivalent: £48,149–£55,755), inc. Oxford University weighting of £900 (FTE equivalent: £1,500) This provides summary

HRUCSalary: £43,077 to £45,540 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are

University of Bath – Human ResourcesSalary: £30,805 to £37,174. Grade 6 This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE