Tribunal finds Acas Code applies to SOSR dismissals
95% of employees agreed to a contractual change owing to the company’s financial situation. Mr Cummings did not and was dismissed for “some other substantial reason” (SOSR). A tribunal found the dismissal procedurally and substantively fair, albeit that the employer had not complied with the Acas Code on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. The ‘breach’ of the Code was that Siemans did not write a letter to Mr Cummings inviting him to the dismissal meeting. However, Siemans had complied with the spirit of the Code and had a sound business reason for the change.
The surprising aspect of the case was the tribunal’s finding that the Code applied to a SOSR dismissal. The Code states that “disciplinary situations include misconduct and/or poor performance”. According to the tribunal, the word ‘include’ means that its application is not necessarily limited to those issues. But the Code is designed to “help employers deal with disciplinary and grievance situations in the workplace” and it is difficult to see how the events in this case could in any way be described as a “disciplinary situation”.
For the time being, while the legal debate ‘rages’ on, the case serves as a very useful reminder that the good practice set out in the Acas Code should be followed when any dismissal is contemplated, except of course, ‘retirement’ at or above the default retirement age (DFA), or under the DFA but which does not amount to unlawful age discrimination, and where in both cases a specific statutory procedure applies.
November 2010
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
