Judge applied the wrong test in deciding whether a redundancy situation existed

In Murray v Foyle Meat Ltd, the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine said that the language

In Murray v Foyle Meat Ltd, the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine said that the language of one of the statutory definitions of redundancy – the requirements of the business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind have diminished – is “simplicity itself”. The EAT’s decision in Servisair UK Ltd v O’Hare and others shows that difficulty remains in identifying when a redundancy situation exists.

In this case, the number of flights dealt with in and out of Gatwick airport was expected to drop by 34%. As a result it was necessary to cut costs by reducing the employee headcount, including reducing the number of full time dispatchers by 12, with Grade 5 roles being replaced by new Grade 4 roles. An employment judge decided there was no redundancy situation. She found that as Grade 4 and 5 work was identical, there was no diminution in the type of work carried out by dispatchers. The reason for dismissal was cost, i.e. Grade 4 could do the same job for less money.

The EAT upheld the employees’ appeal. The judge had applied the wrong test. The judge stated that for there to be a redundancy, the employer’s requirements for work of a particular kind to be carried out had to have diminished. But that’s not what the law says. It requires that the requirements of the business for employees to carry out work of a particular kind have [ceased] or diminished. By missing out the for employees element, the judge had mistakenly thought that because there was no diminution in the type of work carried out by dispatchers, there was no redundancy. Applying the right test, there was a prima facie case that a redundancy situation existed as it was clear from the evidence that less employees were needed.

This case highlights that the question is not whether work of a particular kind done by employees has ceased or diminished, but whether the requirement for employees to do that work has ceased or diminished; in other words, reduced headcount.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

How to support employees worried and stressed about their finances

3 April 2025

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Queen Mary University of London – HRSalary: £39,463 to £45,974 per annum. This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment

All about the role and company I would be working for: HR Coordinator / Administrator Location: London (Hybrid – 3 days in office) Are you

Company: An award winning Wealth Management firm Location: St. Albans, Hertfordshire (1 day a week) Contract Type: Permanent role on a part time basis (2-3

Serve as a strategic and active contributor to the HR team, advising on HR best practices. As a result of ongoing international growth, the business

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE