In Lock and others v British Gas Trading Ltd and another, an employment tribunal asked the ECJ whether commission payments had to be included in the calculation of holiday pay under the Working Time Directive. The ECJ held that, where remuneration includes contractual commission based on sales achieved, then EU law requires that the commission payments must be included in the calculation of statutory holiday pay because the payments are inherently linked to the performance of the tasks that the worker is required to carry out.
The case then went back to the employment tribunal who had to decide whether the UK’s Working Time Regulations (WTR) in their current format could be read to comply with the ECJ’s decision, or, if words needed to be added so that the calculation of a week’s pay would conform with EU law. The tribunal decided that the latter situation applied and could be achieved by adding the following paragraph (e) to regulation 16(3) of the WTR 1998: “(e) as if, in the case of the entitlement under regulation 13, a worker with normal working hours whose remuneration includes commission or similar payments shall be deemed to have remuneration which varies with the amount of work done for the purposes of section 221 [of the Employment Rights Act 1996].”
While in similar cases, tribunals are likely to follow this decision in determining statutory holiday pay, it is not a binding precedent and of course could be appealed. In addition, the tribunal confirmed that the two related crucial issues for employers would be decided in the second part of the judgment to be delivered later, i.e. (i) the question of the correct reference period over which to determine the relevant amount of holiday pay (S.221 ERA 1996 sets a 12 week reference period which may not meet EU law requirements); and (ii) how to actually calculate statutory holiday pay, particularly where rolled up holiday payments are operated.
Content Note
The aim is to provide summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. In particular, where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out full details of all the facts, the legal arguments presented by the parties and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links provided to access full details. If no link is provided contact us for further information. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.