In Flemming v EEAS NHS Trust, F had a heart attack and subsequently suffered from an anxiety depression disorder, caused by a failure to be able to return to work where he perceived the employer to be showing a lack of support. F wrote to the HR Director complaining about his situation indicating he had contemplated suicide. He was told the letter was unacceptable and if he did it again, the correspondence would be forwarded to the employer’s solicitors. During an adjournment in a disciplinary hearing, F left his phone on ‘record’ in the room and later heard a panel member make a remark about “pummelling it into him with my fists.” F was dismissed for failing to attend a further disciplinary hearing without reasonable excuse and refusing to meet with Occupational Health. An ET found that the need for F to attend both meetings arose from his disability. His failure to attend was the product of his sense of anger because of the way he had been treated. His disability was an effective cause of that anger and so of his conduct, and this meant he was unfavourably treated because of something arising in consequence of his disability. The employer could not justify the treatment and F was awarded £92,000.
The updates are kindly provided by Simons Muirhead & Burton Law firm
This update provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and help judgments made in every aspect of the case. Click on the links to access full details. If no link is provided, contact us for more information. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, SM&B cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.
This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court cases are reported, the information does not set out all of the facts, the legal arguments presented and the judgments made in every aspect of the case. Employment law is subject to constant change either by statute or by interpretation by the courts. While every care has been taken in compiling this information, we cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. Specialist legal advice must be taken on any legal issues that may arise before embarking upon any formal course of action.