Barber wins unfair dismissal case after calling in sick following a weekend party

In the case of Miss C Thorley v Acute Barbers Celine Thorley was sacked by salon owner Christian Donnelly after he warned her ‘not to let him down’ next week when she told him she was having people over on the Saturday night. When she texted him on the Monday saying she had stomach ache and could not get out of bed, he said he’d ‘had enough’ of her calling in sick after a ‘good weekend’ and sacked her.

In the case of Miss C Thorley v Acute Barbers Celine Thorley was sacked by salon owner Christian Donnelly after he warned her ‘not to let him down’ next week when she told him she was having people over on the Saturday night.

When she texted him on the Monday saying she had stomach ache and could not get out of bed, he said he’d ‘had enough’ of her calling in sick after a ‘good weekend’ and sacked her.

But she has now won an unfair dismissal claim after an employment tribunal ruled she had been genuinely ill.

Her boss thought she was a ‘friendly and talented’ barber, but their relationship came under strain when she developed a pattern of calling in sick on Mondays the tribunal heard.

Mr Donnelly said that, in her first year of working, she had more time off than all of her colleagues ‘combined’.

He claimed these sickness days fell conveniently on Mondays and Tuesdays after a heavy weekend, recalling 17 such occasions, plus a 10 day absence because of a burn.

Miss Thorley told the Cardiff hearing she was suffering from suspected endometriosis, a disease affecting the lining of a woman’s womb.

Employment Judge Roseanne Russell determined that Miss Thorley was sick with a ‘heavy period’ at the time she was sacked.

She said: ‘I considered that menorrhagia (heavy periods) is a symptom of suspected endometriosis. (Miss Thorley) has menorrhagia. Overall, I concluded that (Miss Thorley) had a physical impairment of menorrhagia at the material time.’

Upholding her claim of unfair dismissal, Judge Russell said: ‘(Mr) Donnelly did not act reasonably in all the circumstances in treating (Miss Thorley’s) poor attendance as a sufficient reason to dismiss.

‘(She) never received any formal warnings about her attendance. She was not invited to a meeting to discuss her non-attendance.

‘She was not given an opportunity to explain herself before being dismissed. There was no fair process followed.’ Miss Thorley was awarded £3,453 in compensation.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Five ways to supporting employee financial wellbeing

26 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Greenwich – HRSalary: £45,163 to £55,295 per annum, plus £5400 London weighting pro rata per annum This provides summary information and comment on

Universities UK – Human ResourcesSalary: £21,441 to £24,474 per annum pro rata, dependant on experience This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

Derby College GroupSalary: £39,748 per annum, pro rata (actual salary £32,229) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Oxford – NDM HR Centres of ExcellenceSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata) – Grade 6 This provides summary information and comment

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE