EAT rules that school was not vicariously liable for abuse by a man on work experience placement against the Claimant student

In the case of MXX v A Secondary School the defendant (respondent) was a co-educational secondary school providing education for children aged 11 to 16. In December 2013 the claimant (appellant), then aged 13, joined the school. Between 24 and 28 February 2014, one of the defendant’s former pupils (PXM), undertook a work experience placement at the school. He was aged 18 and attending college hoping to qualify as a physical education (“PE”) teacher.

In the case of MXX v A Secondary School the defendant (respondent) was a co-educational secondary school providing education for children aged 11 to 16. In December 2013 the claimant (appellant), then aged 13, joined the school. Between 24 and 28 February 2014, one of the defendant’s former pupils (PXM), undertook a work experience placement at the school. He was aged 18 and attending college hoping to qualify as a physical education (“PE”) teacher.

By early March 2014 PXM and the claimant were communicating on Facebook and exchanges continued until September 2014. In August 2014 PXM committed assault and battery against the claimant. In September 2014 he was arrested and on 2 November 2015 PXM pleaded guilty to sexual activity with a child.

At trial, the claim was dismissed on the basis that the Defendant was not vicariously liable for the torts committed against the claimant by PXM. The Claimant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The Claimant relied on a variety of factors in alleging that the Defendant was in a position akin to employment, including that the Defendant regulated many aspects of its relationship with PXM, such as his hours of attendance; the Defendant supervised, directed and controlled PXM’s activities within its school; PXM was held out to the Defendant’s pupils as a staff member: they were told to address him and treat him as they would a staff member and PXM spent his break time with the staff; and the activities undertaken by PXM were of benefit to the Defendant.

The appeal was ultimately dismissed because PXM’s abuse of MXX was not sufficiently closely connected to the duties delegated to him during his work experience placement. Davies LJ attached considerable weight to the determination that PXM had no caring or pastoral role for the pupils. In addition, PXM did not exercise authority over the pupils, he had limited interactions with MXX at the school, he was on placement for only one week, and communication on Facebook did not begin until after his placement.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Addressing alcohol in the workplace – what HR Directors need to know 

25 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Oxford – Nuffield Department of MedicineSalary: £27,838 to £31,459 per annum (pro rata). This is inclusive of a pensionable Oxford University Weighting of

JOB TITLE: Hotel Manager – FTC 12 months – January 2025 start LOCATION; North West England SALARY: Around £45,000 per year plus performance-based bonus, rewards,

We are seeking a dynamic and driven Human Resources Officer to become a key player in The Welbeck Team In this exciting role, you’ll invent

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE