The importance of time limits in an employment tribunal

In Concentrix CVG Intelligent Contact v Miss D Obi the employment tribunal found that the claimant had been sexually harassed by her line manager on three separate occasions. It went on to find that these three incidents amounted together to conduct extending over a period, and accordingly time for presenting a complaint to the tribunal in respect of all of them ran from the date of the last incident. Calculating limitation in that way, these complaints had been presented one day out of time. The tribunal decided it was just and equitable to extend time.

In Concentrix CVG Intelligent Contact v Miss D Obi the employment tribunal found that the claimant had been sexually harassed by her line manager on three separate occasions. It went on to find that these three incidents amounted together to conduct extending over a period, and accordingly time for presenting a complaint to the tribunal in respect of all of them ran from the date of the last incident. Calculating limitation in that way, these complaints had been presented one day out of time. The tribunal decided it was just and equitable to extend time.

The respondent appealed in respect of the decision to extend time. The issue was whether sufficient consideration had been given to the prejudice that the employer might face in defending the late claim.

The three incidents had taken place between November 2017 and January 2018. The employer argued that it would be particularly difficult for it to answer these allegations given the time that had passed since the earlier incidents, and Miss Obi had not provided any good reason that the claim had not been presented in the appropriate time limit.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the employer’s appeal.

It was held that the employment tribunal in focusing on the claim being only one day outside the time limit had failed to take into account the fact that the incidents had taken place over a long period that extended back over three months.

As a result of the time that had lapsed since the earlier incidents had taken place, it had to be considered that the memories of witnesses were more likely to have faded and so they might not be able to give evidence.

In these circumstances allowing for the claim to be presented could prejudice the employer’s ability to defend the claim.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Untapping the potential of diversity

26 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Greenwich – HRSalary: £45,163 to £55,295 per annum, plus £5400 London weighting pro rata per annum This provides summary information and comment on

Universities UK – Human ResourcesSalary: £21,441 to £24,474 per annum pro rata, dependant on experience This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

Derby College GroupSalary: £39,748 per annum, pro rata (actual salary £32,229) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Oxford – NDM HR Centres of ExcellenceSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata) – Grade 6 This provides summary information and comment

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE