Live-in nanny sacked for demanding money after injury from cooking lobster

In the case of Mr B Handford v Ms Y Shkop Brian Handford tore his scapholunate ligament after he was asked to prepare and cook lobster for his employer, Yulia Shkop. Having never done it before, the self-described “Manny” or male nanny watched YouTube tutorials on techniques to cook lobster.
Justice

In the case of Mr B Handford v Ms Y Shkop Brian Handford tore his scapholunate ligament after he was asked to prepare and cook lobster for his employer, Yulia Shkop. Having never done it before, the self-described “Manny” or male nanny watched YouTube tutorials on techniques to cook lobster.

He was soon sacked from his role after an argument ensued when he requested that Shkop pay for the surgery and subsequent rehabilitation after the accident.

Handford tutored Shkop’s eight-year-old-son at their £5 million home on the Wentworth Estate in Surrey for £36,000 a year – a role he said he had “a lot of fun” doing.

Alongside his role, which started in September 2020, Handford enjoyed free tennis lessons and access to the mansion’s pool. Five months after moving in, Handford was asked to prepare two live lobsters after the house chef had finished for the day. He was told to freeze and cut the lobsters before boiling them so they wouldn’t make a noise and upset Shkop’s child.

When pressing down hard on a knife to prepare the lobster, Handford sustained the wrist injury that required an operation, six months of immobilisation and an additional six months of physiotherapy.

Watford tribunal heard that Shkop refused to take “any personal responsibility” for the incident, resulting in an argument and the breakdown of their working relationship. Handford was told to leave the premises two days later.

The tribunal accepted Handford’s version of events, despite Shkop’s claim he hurt his wrist while swimming. However, his claim of unfair dismissal failed because Shkop had a “loss of faith and trust” in Handford and felt that he “ignored in her view the generosity she had always offered”.

The tribunal also dismissed Hanford’s claim for an unlawful deduction of wages. It ruled in favour of his claim that Shkop was in breach of the requirement to provide an amended written statement, in relation to being unable to work due to sickness but concluded that Handford was not in line for compensation.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

Five ways to supporting employee financial wellbeing

26 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

University of Greenwich – HRSalary: £45,163 to £55,295 per annum, plus £5400 London weighting pro rata per annum This provides summary information and comment on

Universities UK – Human ResourcesSalary: £21,441 to £24,474 per annum pro rata, dependant on experience This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

Derby College GroupSalary: £39,748 per annum, pro rata (actual salary £32,229) This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal

University of Oxford – NDM HR Centres of ExcellenceSalary: £34,982 to £40,855 per annum (pro rata) – Grade 6 This provides summary information and comment

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE