Vegan care worker dismissed for refusing to have Covid-19 vaccine loses discrimination claim

In Ms T Owen v Willow Tower Opco 1 Ltd an Employment Tribunal has ruled that the Claimant’s belief in veganism did not amount to a protected characteristic within the meaning of section 10 Equality Act 2010. Ms Owen, who followed a strict vegan diet and avoided products that were tested on animals, launched a legal case against her previous employers, Willow Tower, following her dismissal. The staff at the care home were required to get Covid vaccinations and, following Ms Owen’s refusal on the basis that the vaccine went against her beliefs as it had been tested on animals, her employment was terminated.

In Ms T Owen v Willow Tower Opco 1 Ltd an Employment Tribunal has ruled that the Claimant’s belief in veganism did not amount to a protected characteristic within the meaning of section 10 Equality Act 2010.

Ms Owen, who followed a strict vegan diet and avoided products that were tested on animals, launched a legal case against her previous employers, Willow Tower, following her dismissal. The staff at the care home were required to get Covid vaccinations and, following Ms Owen’s refusal on the basis that the vaccine went against her beliefs as it had been tested on animals, her employment was terminated.

In her written submissions to the Employment Tribunal, Ms Owen stated, “I declined the vaccine on the grounds that I am a Vegan. There was no clarification as to whether or not the vaccination contained animal products or indeed had been originally tested on animals. I object to the consumption of animal products on ethical grounds.”

The Tribunal found that Ms Owen’s evidence fell short in demonstrating the necessary depth of belief. While she adhered to a vegan diet and avoided some non-vegan products, including leather she was unable to specify when she adopted ethical veganism or provide extensive details about how her life was structured around this belief beyond her dietary choices.

Furthermore, when questioned around the use of wool, Ms Owens shrugged. The Tribunal also noted that she acknowledged using non-vegan products during her employment, albeit while wearing gloves. Moreover, the documentation submitted by Ms Owen lacked substantial references to her ethical veganism, with a greater focus on the experimental nature and potential health and safety concerns of the COVID-19 vaccine.

As a result, the Tribunal concluded that Ms Owen had not established a protected characteristic within the meaning of Section 10 of the Equality Act 2010, and her claim was dismissed.

Read more

Latest News

Read More

‘It’s really amazing, what these women have been able to do!’

14 November 2024

Newsletter

Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

Latest HR Jobs

Leeds Arts UniversitySalary: £35,000 to £38,227 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

University Of The Arts LondonSalary: £43,512 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

My client, a growing logistics group, is seeking to hire an experienced and strategic HR Director to lead their Human Resources function. As the HR

Position: Human Resources Director Location: Central London Sector: Restaurants and Leisure Salary: £90k-140k excellent package Our client, a leading operator in the restaurants and leisure

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE