Legal secretary wins sexual harassment claim after Tribunal rules owner’s remarks were not banter

In the case of Miss M B v JGQC Solicitors Limited a legal secretary has successfully won her sexual harassment case against a law firm where the owner was humorously labelled a “sexual predator” by a colleague.

In the case of Miss M B v A Solicitors a legal secretary has successfully won her sexual harassment case against a law firm where the owner was humorously labelled a “sexual predator” by a colleague.

An employment tribunal dismissed the claim that some incidents Miss MB reported at at the firm were merely office banter.

“Flippant or light-hearted comments can constitute harassment just as much as those made aggressively,” the tribunal clarified.

The tribunal was also highly critical of the comments made about Miss MB in the evidence given by staff.

The ruling highlighted how one witness launched a “personal attack on Miss MB with comments about her shocking state of attire on social media, accusing her of flaunting herself and dressing for the office as if she were going to a night out, offensively comparing her to a ‘Love Island reject.’”

The tribunal was troubled by the argument that Miss MB’s choice of dress or social media posts meant she couldn’t possibly be offended or made uncomfortable by Mr. H’s actions.

Their statements were seen as indicative of the workplace environment Miss MB faced, surrounded by staff who had known Mr. H for many years.

The tribunal emphasized that Mr. H’s actions did not need to have a sexual motivation to qualify as sexual harassment.

The tribunal remarked, “It must have been evident to Miss MB that this group had worked together for a long time, were comfortable discussing personal lives in detail, and used language they did not find inappropriate. It is reasonable for the claimant to have not considered it a safe space to express her discomfort.”

“It is too easy for things to be dismissed as ‘banter’ or jokes, but this cannot be right. It is immaterial whether the conduct is acceptable to others or common in the workplace.”

Her grievance was not investigated impartially, with those conducting it being “very protective” of Mr. H and dismissive of her allegations.

The tribunal determined that the conduct met the legal definition of sexual harassment, creating an offensive and arguably intimidating environment.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    How to support employees with problem gambling

    13 November 2024

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    Leeds Arts UniversitySalary: £35,000 to £38,227 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

    University Of The Arts LondonSalary: £43,512 per annum This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas covered. Where employment tribunal and appellate court

    My client, a growing logistics group, is seeking to hire an experienced and strategic HR Director to lead their Human Resources function. As the HR

    Position: Human Resources Director Location: Central London Sector: Restaurants and Leisure Salary: £90k-140k excellent package Our client, a leading operator in the restaurants and leisure

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE