Male banker wins sex discrimination claim after being terminated while on paternity leave

In the case of Mr J R v Goldman Sachs International, a Goldman Sachs banker, Mr JR, won a sex discrimination and unfair dismissal case after being terminated shortly before returning from paternity leave in 2022. Mr JR, a vice president in the compliance department, argued that his dismissal was due to bias against male employees taking extended leave for childcare, rather than the bank’s claim of performance issues.

In the case of Mr J R v Goldman Sachs International, a Goldman Sachs banker, Mr JR, won a sex discrimination and unfair dismissal case after being terminated shortly before returning from paternity leave in 2022. Mr JR, a vice president in the compliance department, argued that his dismissal was due to bias against male employees taking extended leave for childcare, rather than the bank’s claim of performance issues.

The tribunal heard that Mr JR, a father of two, faced a dismissive attitude from management when discussing work-life balance challenges. For instance, during the pandemic, a manager told him to “sort this out” when he shared his difficulties managing childcare. On one occasion, while on a family holiday, Reeves was criticised for not promptly responding to an email, which was later labelled a “negative sound bite” on his performance record.

Despite positive performance reviews in 2021, Mr JR was told he was underperforming just before his second paternity leave. While on leave, his role was deemed redundant, and he was dismissed shortly after. Mr JR contended that his dismissal was discriminatory, noting that managers had never put forward a woman on maternity leave for redundancy. During the tribunal, Mr JR highlighted the disparity, stating that the treatment he received would not have occurred if he were a woman on maternity leave.

The tribunal ruled in Mr JR’s favour, citing a lack of a fair dismissal process and linking his alleged underperformance to his parental leave. Although the bank denied wrongdoing, the judgment criticised Goldman Sachs’ handling of the situation, finding it discriminatory. Mr JR’s claim, reportedly worth up to £3.8 million, will be finalised at a future hearing, though his compensation might be reduced due to a 50% likelihood he would have been dismissed later. Goldman Sachs emphasized its commitment to supporting working parents.

    Read more

    Latest News

    Read More

    Culture is pivotal to successful DEI

    31 March 2025

    Newsletter

    Receive the latest HR news and strategic content

    Please note, as per the GDPR Legislation, we need to ensure you are ‘Opted In’ to receive updates from ‘theHRDIRECTOR’. We will NEVER sell, rent, share or give away your data to third parties. We only use it to send information about our products and updates within the HR space To see our Privacy Policy – click here

    Latest HR Jobs

    Queen Mary University of London – Human ResourcesSalary: £32,804 to £39,463 per annum inclusive of London Allowance. This provides summary information and comment on the

    We are working on behalf of our client and looking to recruit a PAYE fixed contract for 6 months for a HR Assistant. This is

    HR & Payroll Assistant – Join a Warm & Welcoming Team in Central London I am excited to be partnering with a well-known organisation in

    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine – DirectorateSalary: £34,261 to £38,448 per annum, inclusive This provides summary information and comment on the subject areas

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE

    Read the latest digital issue of theHRDIRECTOR for FREE